By Hydrosimulatics INC  

Recent analyses of hydraulic conductivity data showed that, although the hydraulic conductivity values vary significantly in space, the variation is not entirely random, but correlated in space. Such a correlated nature implies that the parameter values are not statistically independent in space and they must be treated as a stochastic process, instead of as a single random variable.  
 
A. Watch the video below and answer the questions that follow.

Video 1: Different realizations of plume migration in a stochastic K field with lnK variance = 1.0. and a small correlation scale. Mode setup: size of model: 200 x 50m; initial plume size: 10 x 10m; time-step: 1 day.

Video 2: Different realizations of plume migration based on a conditional random field generator (condition points shown in pink). . Mode setup: size of model: 100x 600m; initial plume size: 100 x100m.

  • Why is it so difficult to predict contaminant transport in the field using a traditional deterministic approach?
  • Why is that solute plume distribution realizations are so sensitive to small scale heterogeneities, while the head distributions for different realizations are - for all practical purposes, essentially the same?
  • What is the relationship between variability and uncertainty? 
  • How does spatial variability in hydraulic conductivity translate into uncertainty in groundwater seepage velocity and contaminant plume distribution?
  • How can one systematically analyze solute transport in a risk-based, probabilistic framework?
B. Develop a MAGNET model that can reproduce the above animations, generating multiple likely realizations of conductivity, flow, and solute plume distributions, and perform a sensitivity analysis of predicted plume migration with respect to:
  • lnK variance
  • correlation scales

MAGNET/Modeling Hints:

Write a 1 page memo discussing the predictability of solute transport in heterogeneous media and how Monte Carlo simulation can be systematically used for risk-based decision making in the presence of uncertainty. 

  • You may follow the model set-up described in the animation caption above.
  • Choose a porosity to use for each realization
  • Choose a mean hydraulic conductivity to use for each realization
  • Use a zone feature of the entire aquifer area to assign the hydraulic conductivity as a random field
  • Use line features as prescribed head boundaries to generate the head difference from the left edge to the right edge of the model.